From paul@vix.com Sat Dec 05 02:30:44 1998
Return-Path: <paul@vix.com>
Delivered-To: djb@cr.yp.to
Received: (qmail 6636 invoked from network); 5 Dec 1998 02:30:44 -0000
Received: from isrv3.pa.vix.com (204.152.184.182)
  by koobera.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Dec 1998 02:30:44 -0000
Received: from bb.rc.vix.com (bb.rc.vix.com [204.152.187.11]) 
	by isrv3.pa.vix.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) via ESMTP id SAA19970; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 18:29:08 -0800 (PST)
	env-from (paul@vix.com)
Received: from bb.rc.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
	by bb.rc.vix.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) via ESMTP id SAA24515; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 18:29:07 -0800 (PST)
	env-from (paul@vix.com)
Message-Id: <199812050229.SAA24515@bb.rc.vix.com>
To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
cc: kre@munnari.oz.au, richard@sexton.com, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Who is censoring namedroppers? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "03 Dec 1998 18:30:05 GMT."
             <19981203183005.27579.qmail@cr.yp.to> 
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 18:29:07 -0800
From: Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>

i don't have anything to do with namedroppers, other than to
gateway it bidirectionally into comp.protocols.dns.std.  randy
bush and mark kosters jointly moderate namedroppers, just to
keep spam out.

> Date: 3 Dec 1998 18:30:05 -0000
> Message-ID: <19981203183005.27579.qmail@cr.yp.to>
> From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
> To: paul@vix.com, kre@munnari.oz.au, djb@cr.yp.to, richard@sexton.com,
>         iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Who is censoring namedroppers?
> 
> [I'm sending this message to the IESG because namedroppers is listed on
> www.ietf.org as the mailing list for the dnsind working group.]
> 
> Richard Sexton sent a message to namedroppers agreeing with one of my
> comments about the use of IP addresses. That message never showed up on
> the mailing list. The only reason that I know about it is that he sent
> me a Bcc.
> 
> Meanwhile, I put a note at the top of one of my messages asking why
> opsmail.internic.net was taking more than three hours to deliver mail to
> namedroppers. That note was removed, without my knowledge or consent.
> 
> Paul, were you aware that this sort of thing was happening? Was the IESG
> aware of it? Were all the previous subscribers aware of it? How exactly
> were they informed?
> 
> ---Dan

